Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Love and stupidity

I am going to go out on a limb and say that pretty much all young men are assholes when it comes to getting laid, and most young girls are complete idiots when they are falling in love. Some of them are even aware of this, but somehow various combinations of hormones, alcohol and blind optimism keep them going right on down the same paths.
Take my friend, who for the sake of this blog we’ll call ‘my silly friend’. She has got herself into an idiotic ‘flirty friends that aren’t quite dating’ situation (her words, not mine) and refuses to take any of my fine, hard-won, gin-tinged advice.
My advice, of course, being DTMFA (with respect to Dan Savage).
The background: girl meets boy. Girl likes boy and thinks he is quite cute but, after a long conversation in a bar, maybe a little dull. Girl gets a little drunk at said bar and decides to give him a kiss goodnight anyway. End of story, for a while.
Girl and boy bump into each other at a few social events, and boy seems to be being very, very flirty. Girl things this could be fun and agrees to go on what she thinks is a date. Boy brings a friend. Oh, clearly not a date then. The sudden slap of rejection does what slaps often do to women and turns her on like crazy (fuck off, Mothers Against Domestic Violence, you know that isn’t what I mean). A series of not-really dates follows, with varying levels of flirting. She tries being cool, being unavailable, being very flirtatious, being quite ridiculously flirtatious and mentioning other men she is dating. He seems to be doing all of the same things (except the men part. That would be a different problem). What we have here is a failure to communicate. More to follow.

Friday, May 23, 2008

A Certain Number of Monks

Today I discovered the best collective noun of all time. OK, maybe it isn't the VERY best, but it is the only one that has made me laugh out loud through a mouthful of beer today.
It's from Somerset Maugham's 'The Moon and Sixpence' and is in the middle of a (hopefully) toungue-in-cheek discussion of the tendency of women to use tears to manipulate people (presumably men).
Anyway, the phrase is 'a sufficiency of handkerchiefs'. The olde-worlde-Englishness combined with the biting sarcasm are what got me. It may even make it into my 'top 500 amusing quotations' (TBD - although numbers 1 through 499 are likely to be from Oscar Wilde).

Thus began a short search for other amusing collective nouns, starting from this page, which is mainly just stupid ('an absence of waiters' for example).
However, the frankly weird suggestion 'an abominable sight of monks' reminded me of a good friend of mine who happens, through no fault of her own, to be French. She once translated the name of the Iowa city Des Moines for me: it apparently means 'a certain number of monks'. Not 'some monks' or 'a few monks' but quite specifically 'a certain number of monks'. I think that this would be a perfect name for an indie/punk band. Royalties to my usual address, please.

Ok, just spotted 'a whored of prostitutes'. Excellent...

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Back rub

I really want a back rub. That would be really, really nice right now.

There is a fine line between a blog and random stream-of-consciousness, sometimes, isn’t there?

Monday, May 12, 2008

I want a definitive answer…

I fly a lot, and being a rather laid-back individual, I am a firm believer in remaining in my nice cosy corner next to a power outlet, near enough to the gate to make sure my flight doesn’t leave without me, tapping away productively until the very last moment. I then happily saunter along and take my seat on the plane without any of that tedious waiting around in line that other travelers seem intent on putting themselves through.
Very well, truthfulness has got the better of me. Perhaps nearer to the truth is that I am usually in the bar deliberating on whether I can fit in another martini in the six minutes before my flight is scheduled. Not that I have any doubts about my ability to drink a martini in this time, but sometimes the waitress will take several minutes bringing the damn drink in the first place, and I don’t want to have to leave my olive.
Either way, I am perplexed by the behavior of the throng of people waiting around the gate like starving men at a red cross drop zone, staring at the flight attendant and willing them to call their row next so that they can inject themselves right at the front of the line, make it through the gate and have plenty of time to wait in the gangway of the plane itself with the strap of their plastic bag full of snacks digging into their wrist while they watch a family of six try to fit their entire two-weeks-worth of luggage in an overhead bin.
Apparently this is the crux of the matter: overhead bin space. This is the rationale these people invent for utterly inconveniencing themselves, giving anyone watching them a stress-induced migraine and snapping tetchily at the flight attendant who has dared let those pesky freeloading first class passengers on first. They want to make sure they get space for their luggage in the overhead bin above their seat, and not be forced to (the horror) put their irritating little wheelie-case a little further down the aisle.
Rule 1: unless you are on an overnight trip, you should check your luggage anyway. Otherwise you’ll just have to lug it around the airport in search of the best bar, and throw out all of your toiletries that you forgot to decant into doll-sized bottles.
Rule 2: anything you need during the flight should be by your feet. If you insist on tapping away at a laptop, bringing your own snacks AND having several paperbacks then you can damn well have a cramped footwell. Deal with it.
Rule 3: what are you doing bringing your own snacks? You will be inundated with free peanuts, pretzels and small pieces of cheese-flavored cardboard. Enjoy them. The only thing worth carrying is a decent supply of water, since apparently flying is very dehydrating (as are martinis) and no airline seems capable of serving water in anything larger than a thimble.
However, I am prepared to accept that these people in hot pursuit of prime wheelie-bag-storing real estate do probably make the overall process more efficient than if everyone were like me and hung around until the last minute when the line had disappeared. Although, obviously, if we all did that then there would be no line. Would it be a battle of wills as to who could take it longest? Several of us gritting our teeth muttering “I will not get up yet” until the next person loses their nerve, dashes through and starts the final stampede.

So, I want a definitive answer – is it better to be on first, stow your bags exactly where you damn well want and sit comfortably in the plane waiting, or keep your territory at the gate/bar until the last possible moment?

I really need to start flying first class.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Book club recommendation

Instead of ploughing through yet another worthy 'Kite-Runner' rip-off (you know the type: based somewhere troubled and vaguely exotic, full of carefully designed easy-to-understand atrocities and injustices narrated by a disenfranchised minority/woman, with a dusty-looking matt yellow landscape on the cover contrasting rudely with the shiny metallic calligraphy-style title) I would like to suggest, if you steadfastly refuse to disband the club and actually admit that you don't like the other people and have nothing to say to them, that you read something good. Like this:
'The Meaning of Liff'
Or, alternatively, don't buy it and read the transcript here. Still funny, and means that you really have no need to have all of those annoying people sitting in your living room taking up valuable oxygen, coffee and finger food.
Written by the late Douglas Adams (Who wrote the steadily-declining-in-quality 'Hitchhiker's Guide' series) and some other individual called John Lloyd (incidentally the name of my first ever boyfriend, although almost certainly not the same person, unless he was substantially more witty, sophisticated and prolific at the age of 4 than 12).